Expert Analysis & Litigation Support

Law firms, businesses, and policy-makers retain me for questions involving corporate and fiduciary liability, corporate governance standards, and responsible AI governance that require independent scholarly grounding. My research on Canadian, US, and EU law has informed litigation, judicial decisions, and regulatory work.

 

Expert Witness

Corporate governance expert witness, fiduciary duty expert witness and independent reports for litigation, arbitration, and regulatory proceedings on corporate law, corporate governance, and AI governance and liability.

 

Litigation Support

Analytical and advisory support for legal counsel including research memoranda, case strategy input, and expert opinion on corporate law doctrine, governance standards, and liability frameworks.

 

Advisory

Board governance reviews, advice on corporate AI governance best practices and policies, and professional consulting for law firms, GC, policy-makers, and organizations facing novel legal challenges.

 

Board Service

Available to consider selected corporate and advisory board positions where expertise in governance, directors duties, AI oversight, technology risk, and regulatory strategy adds value.

Typical Questions I May Address

Which governance, disclosure, and liability issues arise from deployment and use of artificial intelligence, including autonomous and agentic AI, and emerging technologies?
When does a parent company become responsible for a subsidiary or actions by employees and agents, and what is the personal liability exposure of directors and officers?
What are the fiduciary duty and oversight obligations of directors and officers in situations involving corporate misconduct, compliance failures, or emerging risks?
Under what circumstances are corporations and their directors and officers liable to shareholders and third parties, and what are strategies to avoid and manage liability?
What legal and governance standards apply to contested mergers and acquisitions (M&A), conflicts of interest, and other significant corporate transactions, and which remedies?
What does current corporate governance practice and evolving case law and regulations require of boards and managers in acting in the best interests of the corporation?

Selected Past Engagements

Retained as expert adviser to an overseas legislature on a corporate law reform package, providing comparative analysis of governance standards and reforms.

Engaged as expert by a Big Four professional services firm to contribute to a report on AI governance standards and corporate liability for AI systems.

Worked with a Magic Circle law firm to provide pre-litigation expert opinion on corporate obligations in the context of a complex cross-border corporate dispute.

AI Governance & Accountability: A New Legal Problem

Existing corporate and external laws were not designed for autonomous or agencti AI systems that make or materially influence corporate decisions and actions that may affect shareholders and third parties. The legal frameworks are still being developed, meaning litigation and regulatory proceedings operate at the same frontier as the research. I have been working on these questions since before most legal guidance existed, engaging with a broad range of issues in my research and publications.

Who Retains Me

Litigation and transaction counsel

Regulatory and government bodies

Law firms and private parties

Corporations and boards

Education & Credentials

S.J.D., UCLA School of Law

Ph.D. (magna cum laude), University of St. Gallen

LL.M. (Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar), Columbia Law School

New York Bar & Swiss Bar (both non-practicing)

NFP Board Governance Certificate (ICD & Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto, Canada)

Works cited by the Delaware Court of Chancery and others. “Assessing Delaware’s Oversight Jurisprudence” (2011) was cited by Vice Chancellor Laster in In Re McDonald’s Corp. Stockholder Derivative Litigation (Del. Ch. 2023). Other works were cited by the Iowa Supreme Court, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the UK Parliament, the Swiss Supreme Court, and are referenced in trial documents.

Services provided are academic, advisory, and analytical in nature and do not constitute legal advice or create a solicitor-client relationship. Martin Petrin is not a practicing attorney.

Get In Touch